<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Texas Lawyer Podcasts &amp; Video Blog</title>
    <description>Texas Lawyer presents podcasts and a weekly video blog on a wide variety of issues of interest to the legal profession, as well as to consumers.</description>
    <link>http://www.texaslawyerpress.com/RSS/rss.xml</link>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:34:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:32:36 -0500</pubDate>
    <generator>FeedForAll v1.0 (1.0.2.0)</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Malpractice: When a Plaintiff Sues a Defense Lawyer</title>
      <description>Randy Johnston discusses the State Bar Professional Ethics Committee&apos;s recent approval of a fee arrangement that would require a client to pay the client&apos;s lawyer&apos;s attorneys fees if the plaintiff who originally sued the client later joins the defense lawyer in the same suit.
</description>
      <link>http://www.law.com/regionals/tx/johnston_defense_costs.mp3</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:32:36 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reversed &amp; Remanded, July 14, 2008</title>
      <description>Texas Lawyer senior reporter John Council and Randy Johnston discuss: Andrews Kurth&apos;s relationship with the Howard Hughes estate, and how some lawyers learned about success by working in fast-food places.</description>
      <link>http://www.youtube.com/v/vASVgHdMC30</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">68C5B84F-EEF4-40B5-B0ED-5F42F770DF7D</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:04:36 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reversed &amp; Remanded</title>
      <description>Senior reporter John Council talks with criminal defense lawyer Gary Udashen about: a battle over exhibits in the Holy Land Foundation trial, when double jeopardy attaches in a prosecution, Darlie Routier&apos;s DNA test, and a proposal to limit attorney-client privilege in some cases.</description>
      <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hac431_GVzI</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6F21AC83-81B0-4578-9A74-A348FC457C6D</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:57:20 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insurance Law: A Plea for a Bright Line Rule: Insuring for Punitive Damages After Fairfield and Res-Care</title>
      <description>When the Texas Supreme Court ruled in Fairfield, it seemed that the court was signaling that punitive damages assessed against a corporation would not be against public policy. But the 5th Circuit recently came to a different conclusion in a similar case.</description>
      <link>http://www.law.com/regionals/tx/martin_punitives.mp3</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7BDECF39-1890-4C54-A4F3-DA694D73D5E8</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:24:08 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>